Volume 3 ,Issue 1 ,September 2026 ,Pages 436-450
م.ی. هەڤاڵ ئازاد محی الدین 1 ; د.توانا رشید کریم 1 ; Dr. Farouk Abdul Mawlud
1 كۆلێجی پەروەردەی بنەڕەتی، زانکۆی سلێمانی، سلێمانی، کوردستان، عێراق
In light of the "Securitization" theory of the Copenhagen School, this research examines the process of utilizing the veto power within the NATO alliance as a strategic and geopolitical tool. The study primarily focuses on the diplomatic conflicts between Turkey and Sweden during the NATO enlargement process, serving as a prominent example of how the "Kurdish issue" was transformed from a national and political matter into an international security issue.
Through the formulation of an intense security discourse, How Turkey managed to portray the presence and activities of Kurds in Sweden as an immediate and existential threat to its national security. Consequently, How the veto power was transformed from a procedural mechanism within the alliance into an intense security pressure tool aimed at compelling Sweden to revise its foreign policy and domestic laws regarding the Kurdish cause.
The research elucidates how the issue of minorities and refugees shifted from the sphere of human rights and domestic politics into the realm of high security and geopolitical conflict. Ultimately, this study demonstrates that NATO's collective decision-making mechanism is not solely for mutual defense; rather, it is "securitized" by member states to secure political gains and impose specific security agendas.
This highlights the complexities between state sovereignty, regional security, and international institutions in the contemporary era.